Re: MD Should privacy be a right?

From: Valence (valence10@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 00:28:05 BST

  • Next message: Valence: "Re: MD The Giant (types of patterns/types of people)"

    Hey David,

    > dmb adds:
    > Correct me if I'm wrong here, Rick, but I think the right to privacy has
    > been well established in the law. I mean, there is no real dispute that we
    > all enjoy the right to privacy, its just a matter of extents and degrees.

    R
    Mostly you're right. There are very few who seriously suggest that no right
    to privacy exists at all. But Platt did, and that's why I addressed my
    comments to that basic point.

    D
      I can only wonder when the issue first went before the courts
    > directly, but I wouldn't be surprized if it were more than cnetury ago.

    R
    I'll check it out.

    D
    > Ironic that the one worried about jack-booted thugs and big brotherism is
    > the first to line up in support of armed cops in private bedrooms. It
    makes
    > me blush. It really does.

    R
    Yes, it does seem a bit ironic.

    take care
    rick

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 00:29:15 BST