Re: MD Should privacy be a right?

From: johnny moral (johnnymoral@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 18:29:42 BST

  • Next message: Valence: "Re: MD The Giant"

    Hi Rick,

    >R
    >I'm not trying to convince you otherwise. I'm trying to convince you that
    >the founders did recognize the constitutionality of sodomy laws, but only
    >when enforced in cases of non-consent (that's the "good purpose" which you
    >alluded to). Enforcing them against private, consensual conduct would have
    >been virtually unheard of to them and so those laws *cannot be used to
    >argue
    >that the framers would have approved of such enforcements*. If you have
    >any
    >EVIDENCE that shows otherwise, I would be happy to hear it. But please
    >don't just make up your own facts to respond with this time.

    Why didn't they make non-consensual sodomy a crime then? They don't use
    fornication statutes to prosecute rape, they have a seperate law for
    non-consensual intercourse called rape. The justices are implying the
    Framers were idiots who couldn't make a law that addressed the issue they
    were trying to address.

    I thought a million acts of sodomy thwarted per year was too small an
    estimate too (and thought it was obvious I was making a number up, to
    counter the courts implication that it doesn't happen at all*), but I agree
    we don't know the number, we don't know how many crimes are thwarted by
    people realizing that it is wrong, as opposed to thinking they might get
    caught.

    *and what does the Court mean by "substantial"? They say a substantial
    number of the prosecutions were for non-consentual sexual assault (like Kobe
    was just charged with). I bet that a substantial number were for consentual
    sodomy also, especially if you take into account how hard it is to find out
    about them.

    Johnny

    _________________________________________________________________
    The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
    http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 18:30:04 BST