RE: MD The Giant (types of patterns/types of people)

From: Erin N. (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Sat Jul 19 2003 - 23:49:31 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD The Intellectual Level"

    >===== Original Message From moq_discuss@moq.org =====
    >Erin, Steve and all:
    >
    >dmb had said:
    >As Pirsig explains, the whole point of writing the book was to explain why
    >people have different perceptions of quality. And his basic answer is that
    >"everybody is after quality", but some people, like the fictional Lila,
    >don't see intellectual quality at all. "beyond her range", as Pirsig put it.
    >"intellectually, she's nowhere", he says. He says "she's pretty far down the
    >scale" socially too.
    >
    >
    >Erin asked:
    >Pirsig defined the intellecutal level and according to HIS definition I
    >would
    >put Lila as "somewhere" on the intellectual level. Do you agree with his
    >definition?
    >
    >dmb replies:
    >The problem is that Pirsig, quite plainly and explicitly, contradicts your
    >assertion. He doesn't put Lila "somewhere" on the 4th level. Not even close.
    >He puts her "nowhere". And he does so more than once. In the front of
    >chapter 13 he writes, "Does Lila have Quality? Biologically she does,
    >socially she doesn't. Obviously! Evolutionary morality just splits that
    >whole question open like a watermelon. .. Biologicall she's fine, socially
    >she's pretty far down the scale, INTELLECTUALLY SHE'S NOWHERE." And again at
    >the front of chapter 17 he reasserts the same notion. "She missed the whole
    >point of everything. She's after Quality, like everybody else, but she
    >defines it entirely in biological terms. She DOESN'T SEE INTELLECTUAL
    >QUALITY AT ALL. Its outside her range. She doesn't even see social quality."
    >I honestly don't know how you can contradict the author so dramatically and
    >obviously while insisting "HIS" definition supports it. Or at least I don't
    >know how you can to it with a straight face. :-)
    >

    dmb,
    did you notice how each character changed a little
    at the end. Is it at all possible that Pheadrus
    could have changed too.
    I guess I see Pirsig stirring pot with all three
    characters. But to you Phaedrus is perfect and
    there is no room for growth. Phaedrus is a character to me. Pirsig is the
    author of that character. I put the quote from Pirsig about he was
    disappointed
    that people thought he was Pheadrus. That he
    was Pheadrus, Rigel, and Lila. Therefore I do put a
    little more weight on what I hear comes out of his mouth
    directly/ what is said more recently.

    Erin

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jul 19 2003 - 23:38:15 BST