Re: MD Sentients as predators

From: Joe (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 2003 - 18:44:50 BST

  • Next message: Joe: "Re: MD Intellectual patterns? huh?"

    On 22 July 2003 10:33 AM brian writes:

    Hi Brian,

    >I do not believe it to be a matter of sentients vs. non-sentients.

    joe: I agree that being a predator is not reserved to sentients vs.
    non-sentients. The most dominant predator on earth is sentient. I was
    musing about the relation between prey and predator on the
    socio-intellectual level.

    >Sentients are not the the only patterns capable of Dynamic Quality strides.

    joe: to move form the inorganic level to the organic level is beyond
    gravity. Whether it is solar radiation or whatever, life occurs. I am
    concerned that Dynamic Quality is portrayed as a pattern like
    electromagnetic force. If Dynamic Quality is undefined, it seems to me I
    know the undefined, not after the fact, but as a basis for my actions. Is
    knowing the undefined essential to my action? Is undefined dq present in
    every pattern? Only a sentient has to ask these questions to communicate
    with other sentients in word patterns.

    >In a single-case scenario, these pattern trapping may work, but do it for
    long
    > enough and I believe that DQ will come to the rescue and break out of
    these
    > pattern traps. It's what evolution has been doing all along already.

    joe: I accept your description of evolution, with the reservation that there
    remains something undefined in evolution.

    > Otherwise, I am a bit mystified by your speech. How is it that these
    > patterns become known? How do you "lie in wait and destroy whoever uses
    that
    > pattern"? I'm afraid I will need a little more exposition about being able
    > to "trap prey through their patterns" before I understand what it is
    you're
    > trying to say.

    joe: Sentients are ferocious predators by being able to figure out the
    patterns of the movements of prey. They then create a suitable weapon and
    lie in wait.

    Communication is used in the social, intellectual orders. Communication is
    improved if patterns, words, are used for communication instead of gestures
    and grunts. In writing I use words to communicate. I want my words to be
    known by another.

    "lie in wait and destroy whoever uses that pattern"

    joe: Thinking of predators this statement was paranoia on my part about
    discussing things which are difficult. A voice in my head says maybe I am
    wrong and my value is lessened by being caught in a word trap.

    Joe

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 24 2003 - 18:41:19 BST