Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce

From: Scott R (jse885@spinn.net)
Date: Wed Aug 20 2003 - 18:07:29 BST

Next message: Scott R: "Re: MD Chance and natural selection"

Previous message: Joe: "Re: MD A metaphysics"
In reply to: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce"
Next in thread: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Squonk,

You have a really strange way of "sincerely wanting to help" if the only way you reply to someone's questions, arguments, or ideas is just to repeat your slogans. Forget it.

- Scott

>Didn't you see in my second to last post that we AGREE that subjects and objects are not primary? So why are you sending this in reply?

>Our disagreement lies in whether one's philosophy needs to nevertheless deal with subjects and objects, and how.

squonk: There are no subjects and objects in the MoQ.

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Scott R: "Re: MD Chance and natural selection"
Previous message: Joe: "Re: MD A metaphysics"
In reply to: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce"
Next in thread: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 20 2003 - 18:09:46 BST