Re: MD MoQ platypuses

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:07:36 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Forked tongue"

    Hi August,

    > Platt, Squonk, All
     
    > > So instead of thinking "something implies a subject
    > > and a object,"
    > > think "something implies static patterns of value."
    >
    > Isn't it like this:
    >
    > something implies static patterns of value
    >
    > something also implies subject/ object?
    >
    > I say this because:
    >
    > If I percieve something this implies "me" and
    > "something"; a subject and an object.

    Yes. "Perception" is a label right out of the S/O division premise.

    > The whole time
    > we are looking for quality we are looking for
    > something whether its a feeling or something physical.
    > Quality isn't and cannot be nothing, it has quanity.

    First, we don't "look for" quality. Pure, direct experience, prior to
    "looking," is Quality.

    Second, Quality doesn't have quantity. If it can be said to be
    characterized by anything, it is intensity. One is more or less aware.
    The greatest intensity of experience is a peak experience where one
    loses, if only momentarily, the separate self-sense. Great art expands
    one's intensity of experience.

    Finally, nothing is something. Without the "ground" of nothingness, we
    could never know somethingness. In other words, black could not be
    without white there, too.

    > In existance you are something or you are nothing.

    Is that an absolute? Many contributors to this site claim there are no
    absolutes.
     
    > Us, subject
    > them, object
    > fighting, dynamic quality

    This makes dynamic quality just "activity." Dynamic Quality precedes action.

    > I think that this works much better, subject/object,
    > is the static here.

    No doubt all divisions are static intellectual patterns, the DQ/sq
    division being no exception. But, I don't think making DQ the same as
    interaction between two objects works "better" That would make the MOQ
    a version of SOM dressed up in new garb.

    Platt
     

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 03 2003 - 16:06:24 BST