Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce

From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Wed Sep 03 2003 - 18:17:27 BST

Next message: David MOREY: "Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce"

Previous message: Debicki Krzysztof: "Re: MD MoQ platypuses"
Maybe in reply to: Scott R: "Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce"
Next in thread: Scott Roberts: "RE: MD Pirsig and Peirce"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Bo,

Bo said:
However - and here is my point in this case - your pointing to Pirsig still being caught in the SOM" is valid in the MOQ-out-of-SOM sense, yet it's only the S/O divide that counts - not the "M". Do you follow my reasoning Matt?

Matt:
Oh, I think I've always understood what you are proposing, I just still don't think Pirsig has broken free of his great, white whale. And I don't the MoQ is a fifth level above the intellectual level. I don't think you can make the case that it is discrete enough, a big enough break.

Matt

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: David MOREY: "Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce"
Previous message: Debicki Krzysztof: "Re: MD MoQ platypuses"
Maybe in reply to: Scott R: "Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce"
Next in thread: Scott Roberts: "RE: MD Pirsig and Peirce"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 03 2003 - 18:24:54 BST