From: Jonathan B. Marder (jonathan.marder@newmail.net)
Date: Sun Sep 07 2003 - 10:02:35 BST
Hi Bo and all,
BO
>It was Jonathan, but I may have misunderstood. He said:
>"I don't see the S/O divide as a social pattern.
>It is an (intellectual) description of perception AT ALL LEVELS."
>..and it looked like one among many intellectual patterns,
>but I now see that he means intellectual instead of social.
>Will wait for Jonathan's reply before further comments. JONATHAN AHOI!!
I'm not sure what you are waiting for from me. My world view?
Here is my take on the intellectual, in a nutshell:
The issue is of how discreet patterns are discerned from what we assume to
be a continuum of reality.
Clearly this involves primary and secondary waves of perception, that build
up to what you and I would call an (intellectual description). You might
choose to resolve this into a primary preintellectual process (direct
experience?) an secondary abstraction process.
Jonathan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 07 2003 - 10:04:11 BST