Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce

From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:25:13 BST

  • Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O pt 2"

    Hi Matt,

    Ah - I thought there was something else there. The only reason I'm reluctant to become a fully paid
    up pragmatist is that I'm already a fully paid up (literally!) Christian, and I'm not sure the two
    are ultimately compatible. I see lots of good things in pragmatism though. I suppose I'm just more
    in sympathy with the mystical side of things than you are, although I suspect you see it as an
    essentialist view, which I don't think it is. Anyhow, that can all be pursued at another time. I
    still haven't gotten round to reading Rorty...

    Cheers
    Sam
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT" <mpkundert@students.wisc.edu>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 7:54 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce

    > Sam,
    >
    > Connections based on phonics? You're starting to sound like Derrida ;-)
    >
    > The differences I was thinking of were just the little ones that we were left with just the other
    day when we were discussing it for the first time. I haven't actually thought about it since then,
    so as far as I know they stand as:
    >
    > I think there should be five levels, ala:
    > Inorganic level - non-replicating persistence (rocks)
    > Biological level - replicating persistence (cells)
    > Social level - non-linguistic semiotic behavior (tigers)
    > Intellectual level - linguistic semiotic behavior (humans)
    > Eudaimonic level - autonomous behavior (citizens of bourgeois nations)
    >
    > What I think you objected to was the placement of tigers at the third level. Besides that I think
    its mainly your reticence at becoming fully pragmatic. I just wanted to make reference to the fact
    that, though you, myself, and Marco would all appear to think that language is a social activity
    (cudos to us), we still are quite divergent (in the case of myself and Marco) to a bit divergent (in
    the case of you and I) in the way we interpret the MoQ.
    >
    > Matt
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 08 2003 - 13:27:52 BST