From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Mon Sep 08 2003 - 21:44:18 BST
Paul,
Paul said:
I make no apologies for using Pirsig quotes from any of his publications. Bo’s assertion presupposes that there is a “pre-MOQ” and “post-MOQ” Pirsig to mix. I don’t think there is such a thing. I’m still waiting for a good reason not to think this.
Matt:
I love how there is so much disagreement about interpreting the MoQ.
For instance, (if I remember correctly) I disagree with Bo about a handful of interpretational issues (some of them major) and (if I remember correctly) I agree with Paul about a handful of interpretational issues (some of them major). But, I agree with Bo that the Pirsig of ZMM is enough different from the Pirsig of Lila to warrant a distinction between the two. However, I also mix quotes from all of his publications depending on circumstance because I think the dividing line is one of emphasis. I think the early Pirsig emphasizes a pragmatist/post-modern reading of philosophy and the late emphasizes a essentialist/modern reading. But there are elements of both in both.
Matt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 08 2003 - 21:44:56 BST