From: Paul Turner (paulj.turner@ntlworld.com)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:32:35 BST
Matt
Matt:
I love how there is so much disagreement about interpreting the MoQ.
Paul:
The thing is, how many philosophers are you aware of that have been
handed "transcripts" of un-moderated conversations demonstrating the
different interpretations of their work AND have been given the
opportunity to comment on, refute and correct interpretations?
So whilst I don't deny that there is still room for interpretation, it
seems to me that Pirsig in Lila's Child answers most of the major
questions of "what he means by..", interpretations like Bo's SOLAQI.
What remains to be seen is whether or not it is a good idea. For
example, is value a good description of empirical experience? Does a
Dynamic/static conception of experience provide a better way to approach
life than subject/object?
Paul
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 09 2003 - 11:33:42 BST