Re: MD Illusions--Richard Bach's creatures

From: abahn@comcast.net
Date: Sun Sep 14 2003 - 04:46:15 BST

  • Next message: abahn@comcast.net: "MD archives"

    Hi Yale,

    You said:
    "...deep and unsatisfiable courageous thinkers like you -- and the relatively
    few seekers like you and me and I dare say Patrick, who have less than the
    average need to cling to what we currently believe, and a more than average
    desire to not hold for too long any successor beliefs we may wish to play with
    for a while."

    Andy:
    Although I don't like to throw accolades at myself at the expense of anyone,I'll
    drink to above.

    Regards,
    Andy
    > Andy, more and more I see that I was grossly mistaken about my opinion of
    > you and your quality of exploration. So I greatly aologize in public here
    > for my misguided and totally wrong, flip remarks to you.
    >
    > Needless to say I completely agree with what you are saying below. And
    > while you are not inclined to do so, please note that I wrote my Fractal
    > Philosophy paper about things like "the softest of software" and an
    > underlying ethos inherent in at least some categories of changes only for
    > deep and unsatisfiable courageous thinkers like you -- and the relatively
    > few seekers like you and me and I dare say Patrick, who have less than the
    > average need to cling to what we currently believe, and a more than average
    > desire to not hold for too long any successor beliefs we may wish to play
    > with for a while.
    >
    > Regards., Yale
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: <abahn@comcast.net>
    > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 7:45 AM
    > Subject: Re: MD Illusions--Richard Bach's creatures
    >
    >
    > > Hi Platt,
    > >
    > > Yes, I have witnessed your interpretation of the MOQ being all about
    > morals on
    > > this site for some time now. I appreciate your perspective Platt, but I
    > don't
    > > agree with it. Although, I think morals are important to the MOQ, I don't
    > think
    > > they were intended by Pirsig to be fixed and absolute. At least, I don't
    > want
    > > to read Pirsig this way.
    > >
    > > I also liked "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" by Bach and I agree this would
    > make a
    > > nice metaphor for the MOQ. I remember JLS, the protagonist, straying off
    > from
    > > the rest of the gulls, society, in order to discover his calling. The
    > rest of
    > > the gulls were gathered around landfills and beaches, feeding for scraps
    > and
    > > trash wherever they could find it. All the while JLS was off by himself,
    > all
    > > alone, practicing flight maneuvers while neglecting his biological and
    > societal
    > > needs. This journey JLS took is very analogous to being bounced along the
    > > rocks, alone, away from society. :-)
    > >
    > > Thanks for your thoughts
    > > Andy
    > > > Hi Andy,
    > > >
    > > > Your "swimming in the stream" metaphor and explanation says nothing
    > > > about morals. So to claim it's a metaphor for the MOQ is a stretch to
    > > > say the least. The MOQ is all about morals. Your conclusion seemed to
    > > > be that it's better not to cling to one set of beliefs, a conclusion I
    > > > presume we shouldn't cling to either. But I didn't see any rationale
    > > > to support that conclusion.
    > > >
    > > > The MOQ states as an axiom that some things are better than others,
    > > > then proceeds to answer what, where, when, how and why that axiom
    > > > creates the world. A good metaphor of the MOQ would do the same, or at
    > > > the least suggest that the MOQ is about morality, not about "letting go
    > > > of society."
    > > >
    > > > Anyway, I liked Richard Bach's "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" metaphor
    > > > better. I'd rather fly with the angels than bump along the bottom of a
    > > > stream. :-)
    > > >
    > > > Platt
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > > Mail Archives:
    > > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > > >
    > > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 14 2003 - 04:46:59 BST