Re: MD Dealing with S/O

From: skutvik@online.no
Date: Mon Sep 22 2003 - 10:36:36 BST

  • Next message: skutvik@online.no: "Re: MD The S/O divide"

    Scott
    On 19 Sep.you wrote:
    > [Scott prev:] I think I agree. I also think that Coleridge/Barfield's
    > metaphysics is the one I need to work with, and not Pirsig's.

    Bo prev:
    > >Too bad, but just for curiosity's sake, is there a Coleridge/Barfield
    > > metaphysics? If so what is its first postulate?

    Scott now:
    > Yes. The first postulate is that all that is, is as a result of "two
    > forces of one Power", called "free life" and "confining form". Sound
    > familiar?

    Yes it sounds familiar, but is there an identification of a S/O
    Metaphysics? And is there a new metaphysical opening starting with
    something - like Value in the MOQ - that the "free" and "confining" are
    aspects of, except a power? And is there a hierarchy of "confined
    powers" starting with "confined inorganic power" ...and so on
    ...ending with "confined intellectual power"? And how does
    (Coleridge/Barfield?) define this last one?
     
    I was disappointed by your statement that the C/B metaphysics is the
    one you need, and not Pirsig's, still hope it wasn't all serious.

    > [Scott pre prev:] In any case, my interest is in the mind. Pirsig puts
    > the mind as the fourth static level.

    Bo prev.:
    > He did not ..put the
    > mind as the fourth static level until Lila's Child.......etc.

    Scott now:
    > I think I agree with others that, though he did not explicitly say so,
    > he nevertheless considered mind as the intellectual level while
    > writing Lila, i.e., his explicit statement in LC is consistent with
    > Lila. Nevertheless, I agree (as I have been expostulating in other
    > posts to Paul, Platt, and DMB) that the treatment of mind and
    > intellect in Lila needs work. However, I would also say that the ZAMM
    > picture also needs work, to be provided by the logic of contradictory
    > identity.

    Needs work. Right. I have a post almost ready to the MD where I
    propose a solution to all differences over the intellectual level. I am
    particularly interested in your reaction, so keep an eye open for it.

    Sincerely.
    Bo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 22 2003 - 10:47:14 BST