Re: MD Dealing with S/O

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:16:01 BST

  • Next message: David MOREY: "Re: MD The narrator"

    Hi Dan

    Did you compile LC?
    Well, I accept your emotional attachment.
    My apologies if you thought I said something about LC
    was silly, having not read it, my comment was entirely
    in respect of an interpreatation being offered. I think
    the production of LC off the back of this site is an
    impressive achievement and must have been a lot of
    work, keep up the good work, Pirsig deserves all the
    attention he gets. I had a copy of ZMM for years before
    I read it and realised what I had been sitting on.
    Also apologies for my earlier dismissive responses,
    I assumed you were starting the abuse, but clearly you
    thought I had. Bad idea because I am used to a lot
    of abuse and can absorb the slights quite happily for
    for years, well 39 years to date.

    Regards your abused and abusing.
    DM
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
      To: moq_discuss@moq.org
      Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:03 PM
      Subject: Re: MD Dealing with S/O

      Dan:
      In my experience I have found it is
      best not to rely on what another person says, especially someone (Mark) who
      also apparently has NOT read the book.

      Do you understand me now?

      Dan

      Hello Dan,
      I make mistakes from time to time, and when i make mistakes i try to correct them. Robert Pirsig makes mistakes from time to time also, as do you, and computers working for the Tax dept. The only difference with the Tax computers is that they CAN screw up your life big time!
      I apologised to Dave M and i must apologise to you also. I apologise for my incorrect statement regarding mind and Lila's child.
      Having said that, in a letter to Anthony McWatt, RMP recommends that mind is a term to be avoided whenever possible. And as the RMP writing to Anthony McWatt is the same RMP replying to Lila's child contributors, i do not feel i can be charged with the accusation of misleading people, not that you are launching that charge?

      As the compiler of Lila's child, may i ask: How do you feel about the use of the term mind? Is it to be avoided as RMP suggests?
      I have read Lila's child by the way.
      Mark

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 25 2003 - 19:20:20 BST