Re: MD Dealing with S/O

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 20:30:58 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD SOM's ambiguities--an opening for the MOQ"

    Hi Mark,

    You said: " In this post you say: 'It (the MoQ) has a formal structure that
    is
    open to some criticisms. The debates we often find here are on this formal
    structure and the strengths and weaknesses of it.' Now i do not intend any
    disrespect, but this statement flatly contradicts your later statement: 'It
    is
    my opinion that the proper MOQ does not exist...' How the hell something that
    does not exist can have a formal structure is something i find exhilarating
    in
    its absurdity."

    Andy: You see a cotradiction because you hold "proper" and "formal" to mean
    the
    same thing. In fact, they are different words with different meanings. When
    I
    hear someone talk about "the proper MOQ", I assume they mean a fixed entity
    representing the True MoQ. This is what I think does not exist.

    I hope this clarification helps,
    Andy

    Hello Andy,
    If the proper MoQ is that enjoying high social approval, then i can identify
    the proper MoQ at this moment in time. My wish is not to challenge, but to
    work with it. I do that because the MoQ, as i understand it, is good. I reject
    interpretations because they are not so nearly as good, as i see them.
    Mark

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 25 2003 - 20:33:06 BST