Re: MD Dealing with S/O

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Fri Sep 26 2003 - 20:55:06 BST

  • Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD The narrator"

    In a message dated 9/26/03 2:54:00 PM GMT Daylight Time,
    daneglover@hotmail.com writes:

    > Hi Mark
    >
    > Did Bo really assert that? Personally, I find a lot of value in Bo's SOLAQI,
    >
    > just as I find value in Sam Norton's eudaimonic MOQ and in Doug Renselle's
    > Quantonics website, but there is only one author of the proper MOQ. I am
    > quite sure Bodvar knows that too.
    >
    > Dan
    >
    >

    Hi Dan,
    Thanks for your reply.
    If the matter were not so clearly stated by Bo himself i would agree with
    your last sentence. However, examination reveals a number of occasions, and posts
    to numerous individuals, that Bo has repeatedly insisted, barring copywrite
    protection, that he (Bo) would be regarded as the author of the 'proper MoQ.'
    I am pleased you find value in Bo's work and that of many others; I find
    value in them myself. Sadly, i do not feel Bo helps the promotion of the MoQ by
    making what are generally considered to be outrageous claims regarding his own
    views and ideas.
    Speaking as one who sincerely wishes for the MoQ to help others, as i feel it
    has helped me, i cannot but help feeling frustrated surveying the damaging
    consequences of Bo's contribution in recent years.
    Mark

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 26 2003 - 20:56:05 BST