Re: MD Dealing with S/O

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Sat Sep 27 2003 - 13:05:33 BST

  • Next message: abahn@comcast.net: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"

    In a message dated 9/27/03 8:47:42 AM GMT Daylight Time, skutvik@online.no
    writes:

    > "the proper author of the MOQ"! .....I recant. That there is a general
    > unease about the present (LC) definition of the intellectual level is no
    > secret, nor is it a secret that I have suggested a different formulation
    > (from the "solution" message Mark will find that I claim it to be Pirsigs
    > original idea).
    >

    Hello Bo,
    There is no general unease regarding the intellectual level among those who
    accept the MoQ. You do not accept the MoQ, and never have. You are therefore
    generating the unease.
    Your solution post is risible, for the simple reason that there isn't a
    problem to solve. The problem is entirely of your own making. This is more 'author
    of the proper MoQ' stuff isn't it? More Bo sitting inside his own bubble.

    I think you will discover those who are prepared to travel with you on the
    road of unease are actually the very same people as yourself: People who do not
    accept the MoQ. Steve does not accept it, Matt finds many problems with it,
    DMB does not find the MoQ valuable, Sam is a Christian, so there is little
    chance of a fair hearing there is there?

    So you regard yourself to be the an intellectual chief do you?
    I do not feel any self respecting man would assume to make such a claim. And
    you have no respect from me.
    Mark

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 27 2003 - 13:06:50 BST