Re: MD Intellectual level - New letter from Pirsig

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 22:16:55 BST

Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"

Previous message: David MOREY: "Re: Re: MD The final solution or new frustration."
Maybe in reply to: Paul Turner: "MD Intellectual level - New letter from Pirsig"
Next in thread: Dan Glover: "Re: MD Intellectual level - New letter from Pirsig"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 10/3/03 6:32:39 PM GMT Daylight Time, skutvik@online.no
writes:

Bo:
> Here Pirsig treats Q-intellect much like SOM's mind and if SOM is
> rejected I find it strange that intellect should assume that role.
>

Mark: The term Q-intellect has no meaning in the MoQ. This term is an
invention of your own. Your metaphysics has little, if anything, to do with the MoQ.
Mark

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"
Previous message: David MOREY: "Re: Re: MD The final solution or new frustration."
Maybe in reply to: Paul Turner: "MD Intellectual level - New letter from Pirsig"
Next in thread: Dan Glover: "Re: MD Intellectual level - New letter from Pirsig"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 22:17:59 BST