RE: MD The MOQ makes inroads

From: Erin N. (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Wed Oct 29 2003 - 17:10:45 GMT

  • Next message: Paul Turner: "RE: MD Self-consciousness"

    >===== Original Message From moq_discuss@moq.org =====
    >Hi Erin:
    >
    >> I don't think that thread about art being intellectual or social had a
    >> clear conclusion, with arguments like this it seems even less clear.
    >
    >Excuse my memory lapse but could you specify the dates of the thread
    >about art being intellectual or social in the MOQ archives? Thanks.
    >
    >Platt
    >
    >

    Okay I thought you put art as intellectual from
    comments a long time ago. There were comments about Picasso being an
    intellectual and I thought it was being asserted as art being an
    intellectual activity. There was also a comment about art being different
    from fashion but I don't know where that comment is at either.
    I went and reread the more recent comments and I see you do distinguish
    between intellectual patterns and aesthetic patterns so
    I may have originally misinterpreted the original statements.
    These more recent comments I do know where they are,
    at the end of March 2003 in the thread Intellectual Art thread.
    I am still confused about what you consider aesthetic patterns to be,
    especially when the Starbucks aesthetic argument is made.

    Erin

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 29 2003 - 16:56:44 GMT