From: Scott R (jse885@spinn.net)
Date: Tue Nov 04 2003 - 02:12:28 GMT
David,
> Perhaps your problem is that perception is entirely
> a form of visual language and therefore has all the qualities
> of using universal/particular net/item in net schema that
> is also true of linguistic language.
Since I (following Barfield and Georg Kuhlewind) have been expounding this
idea (actually, all perception, not just visual), I don't know why you are
calling it "my problem".
> Also there is a very big question
> with regard to the development of this visual language, from
> the society of dynamic quanta called the Body Nietzsche would
> suggest, which is not a material form either for Nietzsche.
> Kicking something is a feeling of course, it is odd, says Nietzsche,
> to derive a theory of causality via the nature of our nervous system.
I don't understand this, in particular, how it is relevant to what I've been
talking about.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 04 2003 - 02:22:00 GMT