Re: MD MOQ Discuss Rules

From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2003 - 18:22:08 GMT

Next message: Dan Glover: "Re: MD When is an interpretation not an interpretation?"

Previous message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD MOQ Discuss Rules"
Maybe in reply to: Platt Holden: "MD MOQ Discuss Rules"
Next in thread: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Two theories of truth"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Squonk, I mean, Mark said:
Personally, i find this is making contributing to discussions virtually a no-go. Why? Well, precisely because as soon as one begins a thread, it is hijacked and goes off on a totally different tangent to that intended. Recently, everything is turned into a bloody 'Rortython,' for example, with posts going totally OTT in number. Get a grip on it please?

Matt:
Ah, you're just pissed because I asked Horse to review your membership to the forum (for which Horse correctly called me on blowing smoke and graciously ignored me). Though I must say that your personal restraint in the past several months, going on half a year, is more than commendable considering your own single-handed launching of the war.

Matt

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Dan Glover: "Re: MD When is an interpretation not an interpretation?"
Previous message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD MOQ Discuss Rules"
Maybe in reply to: Platt Holden: "MD MOQ Discuss Rules"
Next in thread: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Two theories of truth"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 18:23:49 GMT