From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Sun Nov 16 2003 - 21:34:43 GMT
Dear Nathan,
You wrote 15 Nov 2003 21:51:42 -0500:
'How would you ... define "life"? I am aware that I am not being fair here
in that this question is easy to state and terribly difficult to answer.'
Seems quite easy to me: patterns of matter that reproduce themselves
(distinction from inorganic level) by means of 'hard-wired' (instinctual,
hormones, nerves, enzymes etc. directed) behavior rather than by means of
copied behavior (distinction from social level) or motivated behavior
(distinction from intellectual level).
David M.'s answer (16 Nov 2003 16:37:33 -0000) doesn't look like a
definition to me. It describes some properties 'life' has, which dead matter
has not (more complexity, more freedom, using energy to become more free
rather than more determined), but these properties are a matter of degree,
not fit for defining a precise distinction between dead and living matter.
And they don't define the distinction between life and even higher levels of
complexity and freedom.
I haven't got the time to read and compare Magnus's take on life
(www.moq.org/forum/magnus/magnus.html). Can someone please summarize it?
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 16 2003 - 22:40:56 GMT