Re: MD Two theories of truth

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Mon Nov 17 2003 - 16:02:55 GMT

  • Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD When is an interpretation not an interpretation?"

    Matt: Rorty said in a reply to Christopher Norris that the only people who
    really get into Heidegger and Derrida are people who were taken by
    philosophy earlier in their lives, people who came down with what Heidegger,
    Derrida, and Wittgenstein would diagnose as the Platonic disease.

    DM: Often true, however for myself, I started with an interest in science
    but found it far from satisfying all my
    knowledge needs, and ended up all the way to Heidegger. Now, the link here
    is the underlying metaphysics in
    science that go all the way back to the Greeks/Plato. Heidegger, Nietzsche,
    Derrida and Pirsig know this.
    My greatest social/moral concern is that most people are either in the
    pre-science religion camp or the post-science
    nihilist camp as far as their overall outlook is concerned. My interest is,
    in the light of what modern life and science
    have done to religion, what is next? I think that many people think we have
    science and that is it, nothing else to think about.
    But science provides practical knowledge, it does not give us projects to do
    or tell us what we live our lives for. What Nietzsche feared is that after
    the death of god our values would regress to simply animal-biological needs
    and social conformity, and we might add some entertainment to cover over the
    horrors of life. And here we are, the biggest challenge most people take on
    is to place themselves as highly as possible in the spread of social
    inequality that we allow to thrive. Mankind is losing its dignity and
    perhaps its point. I feel that I less and less often meet anyone who is in
    anyway interesting.
    Nietzsche might suggest that mankind is splitting in two, and perhaps the
    politico-techno-media-aristocracy is getting ready to get rid of the rest of
    us, we are becoming less and less required for production, this is suggested
    by Houllebecq in his book Atomised, although it could go the other way, it
    looks like we are finding it harder to sustain basic security in the
    conditions of inequality. Dark times, but perhaps it will give us some
    enthusiasm for the light when it arrives.

    regards
    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT" <mpkundert@students.wisc.edu>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 7:20 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Two theories of truth

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 17 2003 - 16:05:52 GMT