From: Scott R (jse885@spinn.net)
Date: Tue Nov 18 2003 - 17:13:38 GMT
Platt,
> > Sense-perceptible particulars are the objects and events we see, hear,
> > touch, smell, and taste. By "see" (to refer to your later post) I mean
> > physical sight, not insight or understanding.
>
> The MOQ adds "value" to the physical senses [Scott] lists. Value is our
> sixth sense.
Does he ever actually call it a sense? All I recall is that he says it is
"verifiable", a source of knowledge. In any case, one cannot demonstrate
truth of value judgments by correspondence. That is, if I say X is better
than Y, and you say Y is better than X, then there is nothing further that
either of us can physically point to to determine who is right (we may be
able to make non-sense-perceptible justifications, but those are not done
through correspondence).
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 18 2003 - 17:15:30 GMT