Re: MD Language in the MOQ

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 19 2003 - 18:19:23 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD matt said scott said"

    DMB:But I think its quite
    > wrong. Its a very naive vision of religion and mythology as bad
    > archaic science.

    Hey DMB this is exactly what Rorty thinks too!
    Congrats
    David M

    PS
    I do think you are missing the useful stuff in Rorty,
    but in fact I do agree that anti-realism is too strong
    in thinking that not speaking nature's language implies
    that there is no way to have a conversation with nature.
    But critical realism is also keen to avoid correspondence
    as well. To not coin a way crtitical realism is the third way, ha ha.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <skutvik@online.no>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 5:19 PM
    Subject: RE: MD Language in the MOQ

    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 19 2003 - 19:39:53 GMT