From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 19 2003 - 18:19:23 GMT
DMB:But I think its quite
> wrong. Its a very naive vision of religion and mythology as bad
> archaic science.
Hey DMB this is exactly what Rorty thinks too!
Congrats
David M
PS
I do think you are missing the useful stuff in Rorty,
but in fact I do agree that anti-realism is too strong
in thinking that not speaking nature's language implies
that there is no way to have a conversation with nature.
But critical realism is also keen to avoid correspondence
as well. To not coin a way crtitical realism is the third way, ha ha.
----- Original Message -----
From: <skutvik@online.no>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: MD Language in the MOQ
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 19 2003 - 19:39:53 GMT