Re: MD Democracy in the MOQ

From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Mon Dec 08 2003 - 21:41:30 GMT

  • Next message: Ian Glendinning: "MD The Sweet Spot"

    Hmmm ... again from across the pond ....
    Interesting stuff DMB, but isn't this statement a bit inconsistent
    Quote
    > It has lots to do with the tendency of (SOM) intellectuals to be be
    > dismissive or even openly hostile to traditional morallity, religion
    > and the transcendental realm.
    Unquote
    I tend to associate christian evangelism with traditional US SOMists.
    Perhaps I'm mixing up your labels.
    Perhaps by SOM Intellectuals you just mean liberals.
    Ian Glendinning

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David MOREY" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:35 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Democracy in the MOQ

    > DMB
    >
    > Coming from the UK it is interesting to hear
    > this sort of thing. Thanks for taking the time.
    >
    > Regards
    > David M
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "David Buchanan" <DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org>
    > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 8:11 PM
    > Subject: RE: MD Democracy in the MOQ
    >
    >
    > > David M and all y'all:
    > >
    > > DM asked:
    > > Glad to see your approach does not try to simplify history.
    > > Clearly the problems of WWI and the depression, hyper-inflation,
    > > war reparations, communist agitation, ineffective government,
    > > saw a desperate nation see dictatorship and the fuhrer principle
    > > as a means of escaping its predicaments and the burden of
    > > a squabling democracy. USA today is very different. What are the
    > > factors taking the USA down its current road do you feel?
    > >
    > > dmb answers:
    > > Right. I still remember phrase I ripped-off for my thesis on Hitler. I'd
    > > asserted that the rise of fascism in Germany was due to "a particular
    > > sociological constellation". Since then, however, I've come to think
    that
    > > its a pretty weak explanation insofar as it construes fascism as a
    unique
    > > event. If that were true, then it would have no connection to the rise
    of
    > > fascism in Italy, Spain, Portugal, several of the Eastern European
    > countries
    > > or the re-emergence in recent years in the form of punk skinheads and
    the
    > > American right-wing militia movement. This is why I think Pirsig's
    > > description of fascism as an anti-intellectual re-assertion of social
    > values
    > > is so helpful. His explanation allows us to see the thing much more
    > clearly
    > > and it allows us to see it even in a variety of sociological
    > circumstances,
    > > even in non-Western cultures, such as the case of Islamo-fascism.
    > >
    > > More to the point, I suppose you'll have to accept a mediocre answer to
    > your
    > > question about today's American version of the same, because I don't
    have
    > a
    > > very good one. 9/11 certainly helped to accelerate it. LOts of it is due
    > to
    > > the "angry white guy" stuff; a reaction to the liberal progress made by
    > > racial minorities, women, gays and lesbians and secular culture in
    > general.
    > > It has lots to do with the tendency of (SOM) intellectuals to be be
    > > dismissive or even openly hostile to traditional morallity, religion and
    > the
    > > transcendental realm. These are genuine conflicts, but I also think all
    of
    > > this, and more, has been artifically pumped up and aggravated by the
    media
    > > and by politics.
    > >
    > > I give brief examples of each. In the last 10 or 15 years a web a
    > right-wing
    > > media organs have developed into what is pretty accurately called an
    "echo
    > > chamber". It goes back at least to the 1970's when Adolf Coors financed
    > the
    > > formation of the Heritage Foundation and some small media outlets, but
    it
    > > really took off about the time Clinton was first elected in '92. As talk
    > > radio and the internet began to blossom even more right-wing
    millionaires
    > > and billionares like Richard Mellon Scaife and Reverend Moon began to
    > > finance magzines and newspapers like the Weekly Standard and the
    > Washington
    > > Times. Once all the pieces were in place, the web would operate on a
    sort
    > of
    > > trickle up basis. Scandalous stories would begin in the ghetto, either
    on
    > > internet sites like the Drugde Report or on radio talk shows like Rush
    > > Limbaugh's. The same stories would then work their way up into said
    print
    > > media, then the mainstream papers and magazines and before long the same
    > > dubious stories would be broadcast on the major networks. The stories
    > would
    > > bounce around for weeks or months until the volume and repetition became
    > > such that only a deaf and blind person could avoid it. This is how the
    > > famous Lewinski sex scandal became serious news and lead to the
    > impeachment
    > > of a President. It started on the Drudge report and ended in the Senate.
    > And
    > > this is only the most famous such story. This same echo chamber also
    > painted
    > > Clinton as a drug runner, an thief, a murderer, as the father of an
    > > illegitimate black child and more. The man couldn't even get a new dog
    > > without some sinister motive being assigned to it.
    > >
    > > Politicians got just as ugly during this same period. Newt Gingrich
    > > orchestrated a Republican take over of the House of Representatives, for
    > > example, by unifying all House races under a single tatic. Namely, he
    sent
    > > out instructions to all candidates telling them to repeatedly refer to
    > > liberals and liberalism as "corrupt", "sick", "perverted" and the like.
    > > There was also a nation wide effort by Republicans to transform the
    House
    > > through re-districting. Most Americans have heard about the recent
    efforts
    > > By Tom Delay to do this in Texas, but it has been happening nationwide
    in
    > > '81, '91 and '01. Not only are they trying to change the borders of
    > > congressional districts in their own favor, which is really nothing new
    > and
    > > is done by both sides, but they've also gone out of their way to make
    sure
    > > that they are as many Black Democrats as possible. They hope to make
    > > Democrats into the minority party in more ways than one. One of the
    chief
    > > Republican operatives by the name of Benjamin Ginsberg has dubbed this
    > > effort "operation ratfuck". Did I mention that this was ugly? There is
    > lots
    > > more to tell, but I imagine you see the point by now. Through media and
    > > politics there has been a concerted effort to demonize anything liberal
    or
    > > intellectual and it has done so by appealing to the most hateful and
    ugly
    > > sides of human nature. And its working.
    > >
    > > like I said, this is only a mediocre answer and things are far more
    > detailed
    > > and complicated than I could ever express in a single post, or even a
    > single
    > > book. But you could probably take any part of this sketch and look it up
    > for
    > > yourself. Its not easy, but its out there. I saw some of this happen
    first
    > > hand. (I worked in talk radio for five years during this period and am
    > > ashamed to admit that I gave Matt Drudge a microphone way too many
    times.)
    > > But I'm also not saying anything that hasn't already been written about
    by
    > > others.
    > >
    > > So, the short answer is... The reason that we're looking so fascist
    these
    > > days is quite simply because people have been working so hard at it.
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > > dmb
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 08 2003 - 21:43:59 GMT