MD Terrorism - a non-physical problem

From: Johannes Volmert (jvolmert@student.uni-kassel.de)
Date: Wed Dec 17 2003 - 20:09:47 GMT

  • Next message: David MOREY: "Re: MD Capture of a Tyrant"

    Hi Folks,

    I'd like to refer to a problem and phenomen, that has been already
    discussed partly hereabouts.
    Terrorism is obviously a severe problem all around the world; and it's
    going to be a much more severe one in future times. Basically no
    differences upon that statement in general, I guess. But what it's
    origins are and how to stop or even diminish it, there is not so much
    consensus, I believe.

    The MoQ can teach us something here, maybe. Origins of terrorism are
    firstly IMO a combination of dogmatic/fundamental religious attitudes
    and feeling of inferiority coming along with hurted pride. The way
    especially the islamistic terrorism develops tells me, it is being a
    non-physical phenomen, meaning a social and/or intellectual pattern of
    value (bad value of course!). It has already transcended the physical
    representation in form of Bin Ladin and has become a
    "Osama-everywhere"-phenomen, which has grown out of local anti-american
    movement into a world-wide anti-western-upheaval. That means - as we
    can see in Iraq recently - that although you catch the originator of a
    movement, nothing really changes (We will see, what is going to happen
    in the next weeks; hope, resistance diminishes).
    But for Bin Ladin it seems to be clear, that it wouldn't change a lot,
    if he is dead or alive. He'd set on fire what was already there. What he
    did was simply: he taught them how to organize, how to fight, how to
    behave conspirative and what was the most important: He taught them that
    it matters us and that it satisfies many arabic people to see westerners
    die.
    Yes, it is not only hate, it is the celebrity-thing as described by
    Pirsig. A Dschihadi is a famous person after his sacrifice. Some
    individuals even shoot popstars to get famous. In all cultures all
    around the world, it had been at times a honourful thing for a warrior
    to do, to sacrifice his life for his community and also for big ideas
    and is so in some regions nowadays.
    To root out terrorism, it is not enough to eliminate certain persons. To
    root out means at first, to destroy the patterns, that lead to such
    actions. To kill certain individuals does not diminish the problem of
    terrorism; in contrast: its fueling it.That is no exceptional new
    evidence but I find it interesting, that a MoQ-analysis shows - apart
    from other reasons - an additional aspect (celebrity) to clear up things.
    No MoQ-based solution comes to mind, but I may state, that western
    leaders and foremost the US-administration have to look for other ways
    to come to grips with terrorism. Easily spoken out, but not so easily
    done is the well know argument to improve the living conditions of
    countries in question, which is both at the same time: right and wrong .
    Right because most of the islamistic assassins come from underprivileged
    countries, and wrong because those persons where mostly not poor, nor
    belonged themselves to underprivileged social classes.

    What I am eager to know would be mainly a MoQ-based sketch of
    solution/ideas.

    Greetings, JoVo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 17 2003 - 20:11:45 GMT