From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Jan 08 2004 - 17:01:21 GMT
Hi David M,
> Can you try to explain what you mean by objective as it
> is a word I generally avoid? Especially when the MOQ is
> meant to offer explanations in terms of SQ/DQ rather than
> subject-object? Or do you mean objective in a different sense?
I mean "objective" according to the dictionary definition: "Expressing or
dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by
personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations."
> I stick only to talking about values or according to
> experience, or current data, or IMO, or it hangs
> togther nicely, or has greater explanatory power,
> or seems to work, or seems to avoid falling into the trap of X,
> or avoids the contradictions of Y,..etc..
As I see it you stick to the value of objectivity as defined above, always
trying to keep your personal biases out of your assessments of reality.
Regards,
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 08 2004 - 19:12:34 GMT