Re: MD Measuring values

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Fri Jan 09 2004 - 17:57:30 GMT

  • Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD Measuring values"

    Hi Platt

    You said:"distortion by
    > personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations."

    I wonder:
    Why should the personal distort? The personal
    perspective is what we all start with. Can we escape it?
    Can we extract what is personal from what we experience?
    Is this not where we begin to split our experience into primary
    and secondary qualities, associating the latter with subjectivity
    and the former with objectivity and so everything falls on one
    side of the SO divide or the other. Yet we can clearly go beyond
    our personal view, we can imagine what things are like from
    someone elses perspective, this is really adding something to what
    we experience rather than removing distortions, we can communicate
    and be told about all sorts of different perspectives, from different
    countries, from different cultures, different times, and even from the moon.
    Even visual images, like the Earth from the moon, help with this gaining
    of what is really a multi-perspective conception that we use to grasp
    ideas about life, world, cosmos. It is only for such
    super-complex-multi-perspectives that something like a world can emerge.
    Animals don't have a world like human being do.
    You can undertand what I mean by this multi-built-perspective if you ask
    yourself, do I really know the world is round? The most convincing evidence
    must be
    standing on the moon, but most of us have not done this, someone else has
    experienced it for
    us and allowed us to move from our limited perspective to a less personal
    one.
    Using the word objectivity seems to embrace the idea of 'primary and
    secondary qualities'
    that Pirsig tries to get away from by his sticking simply to the word
    'Quality'. The
    clever thing about primary qualities are that they are descriptions of
    experience that we can
    more readily agree about than the so-called secondary ones. E.G number.
    Don't know many
    people who would disagree about what a '2' is, but are the two eyes telling
    the
    truth, or are they beautiful is another matter.

    On the whole problem of the relationship between numbers and values see
    excellent
    article below at:

    http://www.onlineoriginals.com/showitem.asp?itemID=287&articleID=18

    it is by a British mathematician who is asking questions about the notions
    of number, space and time in the context of the challenge to these ideas by
    Whitehead, Bohm,
    Bergson and Shledrake. I think this will interest anyone here with an
    interest in science and
    process theory and it is not technical.

    regards
    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Platt Holden" <pholden@sc.rr.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:01 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Measuring values

    > Hi David M,
    >
    > > Can you try to explain what you mean by objective as it
    > > is a word I generally avoid? Especially when the MOQ is
    > > meant to offer explanations in terms of SQ/DQ rather than
    > > subject-object? Or do you mean objective in a different sense?
    >
    > I mean "objective" according to the dictionary definition: "Expressing or
    > dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by
    > personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations."
    >
    > > I stick only to talking about values or according to
    > > experience, or current data, or IMO, or it hangs
    > > togther nicely, or has greater explanatory power,
    > > or seems to work, or seems to avoid falling into the trap of X,
    > > or avoids the contradictions of Y,..etc..
    >
    > As I see it you stick to the value of objectivity as defined above, always
    > trying to keep your personal biases out of your assessments of reality.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Platt
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 09 2004 - 18:06:38 GMT