From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Sat Jan 10 2004 - 02:08:27 GMT
In a message dated 1/8/04 8:59:39 PM GMT Standard Time, jhmau@sbcglobal.net
writes:
> On 06 Jan 2004 11:24 AM Mark writes
>
> >> The intellectual level in the MoQ has evolved a repertoire of static
>> quality intellectual patterns.
>>
>> The sum total of the repertoire is evolving in an event stream, or DQ.
>>
>> The evolution of the static repertoire is towards greater coherence with
>> DQ.
>>
>> The important point to note is this view is not a Substance metaphysics.
>> It is a Process metaphysics.
>>
>>
>> There can be no Subjects or Objects in a process metaphysics, which
>> correspond exactly to Subjects and Objects as described in a Substance metaphysics,
>> because all processes merge and evolve simultaneously in the event stream.
>>
>> Differentiation's in language are convenient inventions of the intellect,
>> and Substance is one such invention of the intellect which has solidified
>> differentiation into an unnecessarily and unhelpful aspect of our mythos.
>>
>> However, this convention, being an unhelpful and unnecessary invention of
>> the intellect, is free to be modified or abandoned for a better invention -
>> and that alternative invention already existed before Substance metaphysics,
>> continued to be developed since the emergence of Substance metaphysics, and
>> may be explored afresh today.
>>
>> Thus, we can see inventions of the intellect are there to be chosen on the
>> basis of value, and should not be mistaken for intellect itself.
>>
>> joe: Phaedrus listened to the chairman's: "TRAP! He's using the dialogue
>> to prove the holiness of reason.....Phaedrus says, 'All this is just an
>> analogy.'" (p. 388) "Rhetoric, 1: Dialectic, 0." (p. 389) "As best I know,
>> Aristotle's opinion is that dialectic comes before everything
>> else.....Rhetoric, 2; Dialectic, 0." (p. 390)
>>
>> IMO One student hears and rebels against the analogous mythos. Another
>> student hears and accepts the analogous mythos.
>>
>> What a wonder when you write, Mark, "It is a Process metaphysics."!
>> Questions about the process: is it an instinctive sensing of reality? Does the
>> 'sweet spot' represent a harmony of different melodies?
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>
Hi Joe,
You hit the nail on the head for me, in that sensing IS being in harmony. We
sense harmony, and the better the harmony, the sweeter and more unified
experience - the closer to DQ without destruction.
I am a bit lost for words, i must say...
All the best,
Mark.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 10 2004 - 02:11:25 GMT