From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Sun Jan 18 2004 - 11:40:00 GMT
Hi Bo,
> ".....subjective/objective knowledge distinction as a subset of all
> intellectual truth distinctions". This is to turn things upside-down.
> It seems however as if you (Paul too?) are willing to accept
> "Intellect=The Value of Truth",
I still don't like "value of X" formulations for the reasons I've given, but
I think that if you think of intellect as the value of truth instead of the
value of S/O we would be likely to agree in our classifications of
intellectual patterns as we seem to for inorganic and biological patterns.
That would be a big step forward and enough agreement to allow us to move on
to applying the MOQ to moral questions.
>and this is the S/O intellect in a
> weaker form (the "true" can be shuffled around). But maybe we
> are approaching some common ground.
I hope so. Even if not, I've enjoyed our discussion.
Regards,
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 18 2004 - 11:41:36 GMT