MD SOLAQI as gift of understanding

From: Mati Palm-Leis (mpalm@merr.com)
Date: Sat Jan 24 2004 - 08:32:13 GMT

  • Next message: skutvik@online.no: "RE: MD SOLAQI....confused?"

    Paul, Bo and others,

    Paul:
    I understand it too, but I disagree with it because it is incompatible
    with the rest of the MOQ.

    Mati: Well maybe we understand things differently about SOLAQI. I
    apologize for not keeping up with the various objections to Bo ideas,
    could you summarize how SOLAQI is "incompatible", and from my vantage
    point I can see how SOLAQI is true to the ideas of MOQ.

    Paul:
    I'm not sure what faith has to do with it, but if by SOM you mean the
    belief that reality is reducible to either matter or to mind or to some
    combination of the two, then I think I have the capacity to see SOM and
    how it works.

    Mati: When we talk about defining the "Mind" or "consciousness" related
    to the mind then, there seems to be distorted faith related to SOM. Our
    "minds" idea is somewhat an illusion created by SOM. Ditch the "M" and
    our "minds" are no longer this mystic apparition but rather see
    ourselves as the rational reflection that is contrasted from S/O divide.

    Mati previously said:
    SOM is the "new mythos" that is engrained in this "body of knowledge
    that unites our minds". The problem is S/O Metaphysics, not the S/O
    divide.

    Paul:
    Agreed. The MOQ retains and resolves the S/O divide as the distinction
    between inorganic-biological patterns and social-intellectual patterns.

    "The Metaphysics of Quality resolves the relationship between intellect
    and society, subject and object, mind and matter, by embedding all of
    them in a larger system of understanding. Objects are inorganic and
    biological values; subjects are social and intellectual values. They are
    not two mysterious universes that go floating around in some
    subject-object dream that allows them no real contact with one another.
    They have a matter-of-fact evolutionary relationship." [Lila p.344]

    Mati: MOQ also resolves "Mystic" subjective reality into the social and
    intellect. By doing so "M" is sent packing and the S/O reality can be
    seen for what it is. It is the basis for how we see ourselves
    "individually" as a specific value and understand ourselves in relation
    to all the other realities.

    Mati previously said:
    The reality is that Mankind through SOM has been reaping the benefits of
    the S/O divide while suffering the consequences of "M". Zen Buddhism
    seemed to see this and side stepped this notion of SOM all together. In
    any case when man was able to use the SOM mirror he was able to see
    himself as he had never seen himself before. It was this new capacity
    that creates the new "intellect" level.

    Paul:
    Or it was the new capacity of intellect, the capacity for abstract
    thought, which enabled man to see himself as never before. I argue that
    it was not that SOM enabled intellect but that it was intellect that
    enabled SOM.

    Mati: "intellect enabled SOM" sounds like "The mind enabled SOM". Then
    we are back to mystic reality of the mind that gets us no where. Part of
    it is debunking the myth of the mind. Pirsig wrote, "There isn't any
    "man independent of patterns. Man is patterns." Lila 179 I sense that
    this becomes more clear with SOLAQI.

    Mati previously said:
    I would modify the SOM to S/O divide and then for a brief moment
    consider this. The "true intellectual value" of knowledge can be a
    reflection and be seen in the S/O mirror. Every last bit of it.

    Paul:
    I'm sorry Mati but you lost me here.

    Mati: That's ok, it took me awhile to understand it to. One of the
    beliefs is that SOLAQI is seen as ugly and confining. I see it as
    liberating to understand ourselves as we are, no more no less. S/O
    reality provides for the distinct mirror to see who we are with a sense
    of dignity and honesty that SOM failed. And that is a very special
    understanding.

    Sincerely,
    Mati
     

     

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 24 2004 - 08:33:57 GMT