From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Sat Jan 31 2004 - 13:14:36 GMT
In a message dated 1/30/04 7:42:39 PM GMT Standard Time,
peterson.steve@verizon.net writes:
> Hi All,
>
> Questions:
>
> How is ZAMM's Quality as pre-intellectual awareness related to Lila's
> Dynamic Quality leaving static patterns in its wake?
>
> Are they the same? Is Pirsig using the term "intellectual" in the same
> sense as he does when he discusses intellectual patterns?
>
> Perhaps "unpatterned awareness" would make a good substitute for
> "pre-intellectual awareness," otherwise it would seem that all patterns are
> intellectual by equating dynamic/static with pre-intellectual/intellectual.
> What do you think?
>
> Recently I said, "To infer patterns of any kind, one must rise to the
> intellectual level since inferences are intellectual constructs." Platt
> agreed, DM disagreed. I think the disagreement concerned an implication
> that all patterns are intellectual. My use of "inference" implies symbolic
> representation of patterns so I stand by my original statement.
>
> I've been working with the definition of "pattern" as "perceptual structure"
> where structure could refer to inorganic, biological, social, or
> intellectual structure.
>
> Does anyone have a better definition of "pattern"? One problem I see with
> "perceptual structure" as an MOQ definition is that it implies an S/O
> relationship of a perceiver and that which is perceived. Is pattern an
> inherently S/O term?
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi Steve,
The answer to your questions is found in The edge of chaos.
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 31 2004 - 13:16:20 GMT