From: RycheWorld@aol.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 2004 - 16:34:51 GMT
People,
All of this music discussion is boggling me. If there is "quality" among
music then shouldn't that "quality" be determined by the individual? To say
that Mozart had the "best" quality of music is opinion, right?
Personally, I am drawn into the progressive rock and roll music
(Queensryche, Pink Floyd, King's X...). I feel (sometimes literally!) their music (and
they ARE "musicians") to be most hypnotic and enjoyable, to say the least.
Yet, I find that Stomp is quite unique as well. Stomp is a bunch of people
banging on trash cans, buckets, pipes, and whatever else they can find. They create
rhythms and beats that are ... musical.
So, my question is - Why is Mozart and Wagner "better" than anything
else? Or am I missing the point? (Which is probably the case!)
Also, once something is heard or listened to it no longer is dynamic but
static. Where/How do you classify it then?
Dan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 13 2004 - 16:37:03 GMT