From: RycheWorld@aol.com
Date: Mon Feb 16 2004 - 21:40:29 GMT
Platt,
Again, and apologies for being such a pain, the problem I am having is
this "better" word. I mean, what IS "better"? What maybe better for you may not
be for me. Specifically in music, I just fail to see what is "better" for
anyone.
I do understand that eating nutricious foods are "better" than eating
unhealthy foods - for, say, medical purposes. But when it comes to music, to say
that Mozart is "better" than The Rolling Stones, well, I fail to find what
makes one "better" than the other.
Please elaborate.
Dan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 16 2004 - 21:42:20 GMT