Re: MD Objectivity, Truth, MOQ and Skyscrapers

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 24 2004 - 19:45:28 GMT

  • Next message: David MOREY: "Re: MD MOQ and Islam"

    Steve

    Good spot.
    Thanks for that, it was that part
    of the book that I had in mind.

    regards
    David M

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Steve Peterson" <peterson.steve@verizon.net>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 12:41 AM
    Subject: Re: MD Objectivity, Truth, MOQ and Skyscrapers

    > >> DM said:
    >
    > >> Now I did not say, I believe, that in the MOQ
    > >> the subject simply becomes part of SQ. Rather, this is what I am
    > >> saying: Quality is a whole. It exists prior to SOM as much as it
    > >> exists prior to MOQ's SQ/DQ divide -with a unifying Q in each term of
    > >> course. This is my ontological starting point.
    >
    > Bo replied:
    > > A super-DQ that divides into DQ/SQ is dubious. It compares to a
    > > GOD who is prior to the usual God. No I think it more reasonable
    > > to regard the MOQ a VALUE reality that constitutes the static
    > > system.
    > >
    >
    > Pirsig says:
    > "There already is a metaphysics of quality. A subject-object
    > metaphysics is in fact a metaphysics in which the first division of
    > Quality-the first slice of undivided experience-is into subjects and
    > objects. Once you have made that slice, all of human experience is
    > supposed to fit into one of these two boxes. The trouble is, it
    > doesn't. What he had seen is that there is a metaphysical box that sits
    > above these two boxes, Quality itself. And once he'd seen this he also
    > saw a huge number of ways in which Quality can be divided. Subjects and
    > objects are just one of the ways. The question was, which way was
    > best?"
    >
    > According to Pirsig, Quality is undivided experience and DQ/sq is just
    > one of many ways to divide Quality. David M is correctly interpreting
    > Pirsig's MOQ. Bo, once again your position seems opposed to Pirsig's.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Steve
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 24 2004 - 20:10:13 GMT