From: Paul Turner (paulj.turner@ntlworld.com)
Date: Thu Mar 04 2004 - 15:57:04 GMT
Hello Leland, Platt
Leland said:
Actually, individual freedom can be very BAD for society. That's not to
say that freedom is bad. I'd conjecture that, if individual freedom
conflicts with a society then the flaw is with that society's static
value patterns. What's needed is some Dynamic Quality to make the
society evolve to such a point that the value of individual freedom fits
harmoniously.
Paul:
I think the MOQ makes an interesting contribution to the discussion of
individual freedom by categorising it according to evolution. With
respect to your comment above, individual freedom can be separated out
into biological, social and intellectual freedom. With this
categorisation in mind we can begin by saying that the MOQ supports
*intellectual* freedom from the state but not *biological* freedom. This
is a broad categorisation which needs some filling in, but doing so may
help bring clarity to a discussion around what constitutes a *good*
relationship between individuals and government?
Regards
Paul
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 04 2004 - 15:57:21 GMT