Re: MD Beyond

From: Matthew Poot (mattpoot@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 12 2004 - 07:29:33 GMT

  • Next message: Sam Norton: "Re: MD quality religion"

    Jon(?) Well I guess you would have to include oxygen to that list of
    things we cannot rid ourselves of. Oxygen is actually a metabolic
    poison. It's a corrosive gas, like fluorine, which is used to etch
    glass. Oxygen was first produced as *a waste product* by certain plant
    cells

    Poot: Yes I am aware of this. However there is a fundamental
    difference between free radicals, and environmental estrogens. Quite
    different. Platt remarked that this should not be here, because it
    seemingly does not have to do with quality, but I propose that it does,
    just not in the metaphysical way. So, if that be the case, then it
    won't belong here. I will not get into specifics, and use more
    metaphysical terms, to some other end.

    You also speak of the apparent 'freaking out' of 'people' at discovering
    the bacteria, which are in a symbiotic relationship with the human
    body's wellness (directly affecting the quality of thought, via the
    brain. Now, this presumption, that you know of what I speak
    (environmental estrogens) :

    Jon : Man lives in a sea of bacteria. They are everywhere--on the skin,
    in the ears and mouth, lungs and stomach. *Don't* be scared by your
    science report. Everything we own, touch, and breathe is drenched in
    bacteria. We've adapted together and most of the time work for mutual
    benefit. It has more in common with capitalism than socialism, but I
    regress. Only a small percentage of bacteria produce human disease, the
    rest are harmless or beneficial. So relax. We adapt. What's in the air
    isn't killing us any more than oxygen is.

    Poot:This is very true, however, completely different from what I speak
    of. I think, and I am sure that we can agree on this, that the physical
    health of the body, has a most direct, and important role in brain
    healthiness, which directly supports higher intellectual (spiritual as
    well???) activity. And, if you will wait to see, life expectancy of a
    largely growing percentage of population, will decrease , due , not to
    lack of medical or pharmaceutical (I dont even take pills for my cold,
    because it weakens the immune system) technological advancement , but
    other factors such as diet (relating to moderation and economy)

    Jon: And humans are healthier, stronger, more developed, and live longer
    than EVER before in history--this simply flies in the face of those who
    say humanity is killing itself. And we *don't* need to rid our bodies of
    all those things you mentioned--they actually contribute to a strong
    immune system.

    I wish radical environmentalists wouldn't be so hostile to opinions that
    don't absolutely agree with their own.

    Poot: I do not consider myself to be a 'radical environmentalist' , but
    rather, someone who is a proponent of economy, and and proportion.
    Economy, not pertaining to financial terms, but the true meaning of the
    word. Here is what I found in the dictionary:

    Economy:
      1.. Careful, thrifty management of resources, such as money,
    materials, or labor: learned to practice economy in making out the
    household budget.

    Now(back to the suv :), in what sense would you hold suv's to be
    economic? As I said, unless they are fully utilized , then they are ,
    in fact, anti-economic. What is the purpose of such a vehicle, after
    subracting its lack of precision, economy, etc.? I do not intend to
    say that suv's are quality devoid, but it is just not good practice to
    use them in current fashion (excess). I mean, do you really need a
    vehicle that uses 10 times the amount of fuel, and larger amounts of raw
    materials, and labour to produce, for 1 person to use, simply because
    they have the financial means to do so? It is simply not feasible, on a
    planet of 6 + billion people, to continue to waste to the point of
    extreme excess.

    "He singled out aspects of Quality such as unity, vividness, authority,
    economy, sensitivity, clarity, emphasis, flow, suspense, brilliance,
    precision, proportion, depth, and so on..." ZMM Pg 186 (this quote
    doesnt really affirm or prove anything, but is for consideration)

    Jon: Soccer moms DO have Quality, the kind that makes America Dynamic,
    and that point DOES belong here

    Poot: I don't believe I said that soccermoms DON'T have quality. I say
    that they promote inequality. Which, is "" bad "" in my books.

    Also, if you think of what I have written as not relating to the MoQ,
    then consider this: Our actions, are a direct reflection of our
    mindsets.

    Matt Poot

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 12 2004 - 08:34:09 GMT