Re: MD quality religion

From: Matthew Poot (mattpoot@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 13 2004 - 06:18:25 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD quality religion"

    Hello, sam, leland, all,

    > Now, I'd rather get on with the conversation than have yet another
    > exhausting
    > digression with people about what counts as a religion or mysticism or
    > not, but I still think we need _some_ sort of container in which to
    > hold the debate, and I think the SQ/DQ language is the most
    > appropriate.

    It is certainly a better foundation on which to compare theologies than
    a SOM platform is. Just my $0.02CDN.

    - I would agree that SQ-DQ (throw coherence in there) is more than
    appropriate language for discussion. It encompasses everything. Or does it?
    ;)
    Ill be reading

    POOT

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Leland Jory <ljory@mts.net>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 9:26 AM
    Subject: Re: MD quality religion

    > On Mar 12, 2004, at 4:17, Sam Norton wrote:
    >
    > > In our context, the forum is geared around metaphysics (ie the MoQ),
    > > and it is a very real question about whether metaphysics *counts* as a
    > > religion or not - or even whether 'religion' is a viable concept etc.
    >
    > First, I think we're confusing "religion" with "theology". Religion
    > seems to me to be the practical, social application of belief while
    > theology is the act of intellectualizing about that belief system.
    >
    > By that token, you can be a theologist without ever attending a church.
    >
    > Given those definitions, metaphysics cannot be a 'religion' because
    > metaphysics is not a social activity (just look at the social life of
    > your average metaphysician... but I digress). If anything you might be
    > able to call metaphysics a theology, but even still it seems to be
    > outside of theology as well. Metatheology, maybe?
    >
    > > Now, I'd rather get on with the conversation than have yet another
    > > exhausting
    > > digression with people about what counts as a religion or mysticism or
    > > not, but I still think we need _some_ sort of container in which to
    > > hold the debate, and I think the SQ/DQ language is the most
    > > appropriate.
    >
    > It is certainly a better foundation on which to compare theologies than
    > a SOM platform is. Just my $0.02CDN.
    >
    > --
    > Leland Jory :^{)>
    > Cafeteria Spiritualist and Philosopher
    >
    > "It is a puzzling thing. The truth knocks on the door and you say, 'Go
    > away, I'm looking for the truth.' and so it goes away. Puzzling." -
    > Robert Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 13 2004 - 06:19:43 GMT