From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Mon Mar 22 2004 - 17:07:11 GMT
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your response.
Borrowing language from the physicists is fine.
I try to use language already used by Pirsig. Coherence came from a quote in
which Pirsig describes understanding becoming fantastically more coherent when
using a value centred metaphysics.
My use of the term severe was intuition, and i liked it because it reminded
me of laser light - and laser light was used as an analogy in ZMM for the
extreme rational ability of Phaedrus.
I also have no problems with Chaos or Complexity theory. However, i do not
pretend to have a thorough understanding, and i do not wish to adopt a trendy
mantle! But i feel these areas of scientific enquiry introduce it closer to
aesthetics, and that is very intriguing!
All the best,
Mark.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 22 2004 - 17:15:10 GMT