Re: MD quality religion

From: RycheWorld@aol.com
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 14:23:17 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD secular humanism and dynamic quality"

    In a message dated 3/25/2004 1:22:58 AM Pacific Standard Time,
    desperado1977@hotmail.com writes:
    Yet I still get the idea that most people look at god as a
    thinking, plotting, being (Which I don't completly discount I just feel it's
    stretching things pretty far). So if I disagree with this perspective many
    different religions (or people of the religions) would mark me an athiest.
    My question...among a billion more to ask!...is WHY do we (humans) always
    have to label? You say that if you chose to disagree with a religious doctrine
    then you are an atheist. What if you're not "anything" in particular? Is this
    possible to just follow life and listen to all perspectives, taking little bits
    of all of them? Then what would you be "labeled"?

    Dan

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 25 2004 - 14:26:54 GMT