Re: MD quality religion

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Mar 26 2004 - 15:20:38 GMT

  • Next message: RycheWorld@aol.com: "Re: MD quality religion"

    Hi Dan,

    > My question...among a billion more to ask!...is WHY do we (humans)
    > always have to label? You say that if you chose to disagree with a
    > religious doctrine then you are an atheist. What if you're not "anything"
    > in particular? Is this possible to just follow life and listen to all
    > perspectives, taking little bits of all of them? Then what would you be
    > "labeled"?

    "Hamlet" :-)

    I think you're giving labels a bad rap. After all, in one sense all words
    are merely labels for experience. We use abstract labels such as
    "liberal" and "atheist" to save time. If we had to qualify every word to
    the nth degree, nothing would get done.

    As someone once put it, "Thinking is the waste of time between seeing
    something and knowing what to do about it."

    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 26 2004 - 15:42:13 GMT