From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Fri Mar 26 2004 - 07:21:40 GMT
Dear Matt P., Michael, Leland, Dan (rycheworld) and David M.,
I'm getting a bit tired of explaining that this thread is NOT meant to argue
about religion, but to present religious practises, to ask clarifications
and to vote on their relative quality. Please continu your type of
discussion elsewhere, e.g. in the 'religious content & necessity of
religion' thread. (This refers to the postings from 25 Mar 2004 by Matt P.
00:16:18 +0000, Michael 03:05:43, 04:00:00, 22:02:42 and 22:23:05 -0500,
Leland 07:52:06 -0600, Dan 09:23:17 -0500 and David M. 18:48:05 -0000.)
What I propose here is NOT 'testing the MoQ against religion' (Leland), but
applying the MoQ to religion and testing religions against each other. If
you contest that a 'best religion' exists, Matt (is that what you meant?),
you are either contesting the MoQ, which holds that everything that exists
has/is had by Quality (and vice versa), or you are contesting that religious
practises can be distinguished from each other. (Don't hesitate to present
past religious practices, like polytheistic Norse, if you seriously think
that could be the best.) Being agnostic, atheistic or whatever is no excuse
(in my opinion) for not participating in voting on the relative quality of
different religions, however low you assess their quality relative to other
human endeavours.
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 26 2004 - 07:19:16 GMT