Re: MD quality religion

From: Michael Mathews (desperado1977@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 26 2004 - 09:19:48 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."

    Sorry about that didn't mean to screw up the whole flow just saw the subject
    and replied. I don't really see an issue with it but that's cool, didn't
    really seem like an argument anyway. Thanks for the reference to the other
    posting, I'll read it over. Once again sorry if you misunderstood where I
    was going.

    >From: "Wim Nusselder" <wim.nusselder@antenna.nl>
    >Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >Subject: Re: MD quality religion
    >Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:21:40 +0100
    >
    >Dear Matt P., Michael, Leland, Dan (rycheworld) and David M.,
    >
    >I'm getting a bit tired of explaining that this thread is NOT meant to
    >argue
    >about religion, but to present religious practises, to ask clarifications
    >and to vote on their relative quality. Please continu your type of
    >discussion elsewhere, e.g. in the 'religious content & necessity of
    >religion' thread. (This refers to the postings from 25 Mar 2004 by Matt P.
    >00:16:18 +0000, Michael 03:05:43, 04:00:00, 22:02:42 and 22:23:05 -0500,
    >Leland 07:52:06 -0600, Dan 09:23:17 -0500 and David M. 18:48:05 -0000.)
    >
    >What I propose here is NOT 'testing the MoQ against religion' (Leland), but
    >applying the MoQ to religion and testing religions against each other. If
    >you contest that a 'best religion' exists, Matt (is that what you meant?),
    >you are either contesting the MoQ, which holds that everything that exists
    >has/is had by Quality (and vice versa), or you are contesting that
    >religious
    >practises can be distinguished from each other. (Don't hesitate to present
    >past religious practices, like polytheistic Norse, if you seriously think
    >that could be the best.) Being agnostic, atheistic or whatever is no excuse
    >(in my opinion) for not participating in voting on the relative quality of
    >different religions, however low you assess their quality relative to other
    >human endeavours.
    >
    >With friendly greetings,
    >
    >Wim
    >
    >
    >
    >MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >Mail Archives:
    >Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    >To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    _________________________________________________________________
    Free up your inbox with MSN Hotmail Extra Storage. Multiple plans available.
    http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/es2&ST=1/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 26 2004 - 09:21:31 GMT