From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Fri Mar 26 2004 - 15:06:22 GMT
Particles exhibiting "preference" at the subatomic level says nothing
about the inorganic level evolving. The fact that an iron filings "prefer"
to be close to magnets is a static inorganic moral pattern. Where's the
potential for evolution or response to DQ in that?
I'm still waiting evidence from you or anyone that the particles, atoms
and forces that make up the inorganic level are evolving into new
particles, atoms or forces, or creating new molecules such as DNA.
Best regards,
Platt
Hello Platt,
The Inorganic level is composed of Inorganic patterns of value. We both agree
upon this?
The question you pose is, are these Inorganic patterns evolving?
Let us consider two related questions?
1. What is evolution?
2. What evidence is there for 1?
An answer to 1. may be phrased as follows: Patterns evolve in response to DQ,
and migrate toward DQ as their evolutionary goal. This IS preference. What
patterns prefer is their Dynamic ability to choose in the context of a
protecting static latch - evolution.
I hope you agree with this Platt?
Let us address 2. Inorganic Preferences are the result of 1, evidence for
this may be:
Atoms: Stellar fusion processes? i.e. Dynamic preference into higher quality
static latches. Here, complex atomic structures such as Oxygen, Carbon, Iron,
Sulphur, indeed the whole periodic table, evolve from simpler Hydrogen and
Helium atoms. This is an ongoing process - new Stellar systems are evolving
throughout the cosmos.
Particles: The repertoire of particles appears to have stabilised? This would
indicate that an earlier phase of Inorganic evolution has almost run its
course? Dynamic preference into higher quality static latches has done well.
Having said this, it is now thought that Neutrinos 'decayed' to form the
repertoire if current particles, and this process may be a remnant of that earlier
phase and continuing in a slower fashion today. Evidence for this was
discovered very recently in Japan and Canada.
Forces: The speed of light and Gravitational constants may not be as
'constant' as believed? It is now thought the speed of light is slowing down at an
immeasurable rate. So, at the beginning of the cosmos, light was able to transmit
information throughout the cosmic egg and help create the relatively smooth
texture observed in the distribution of Galactic structures. Again, we see here
an earlier phase of the evolution of Inorganic patterns fading.
Particle and forces may be analogous to the earlier evolution of
multicellular animals? They are confined to an early phase of evolution, and their
continuing line still evolves towards DQ.
Dynamic preference into higher quality static latches again.
Now here is an important point: The lower levels of the MoQ may be condemned
to begin to fail in their drive for DQ? But as a result of that drive and
failure, they pass through a 'sweet spot' of evolution at which point the next
level of evolution takes advantage. That point in the Inorganic repertoire was
the Carbon atom. Carbon atoms are still evolving in Stellar systems.
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 26 2004 - 15:07:59 GMT