Re: MD quality religion

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:39:47 BST

  • Next message: Joe: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."

    Dear (potential) fans of at least one religion (-: ,

    High time to present as my favourite religion: Quakers alias the 'Religious
    Society of Friends', or rather the European variant, which I know best.

    Platt explained 17 Mar 2004 07:38:22 -0500 the difference between his
    religion of 'pursuing Dynamic Quality by creating and contemplating art as
    well as by pursuing beauty in all my endeavors' and 'other religious
    activity' with:
    'No need for intermediaries (church, rituals, priests, gurus) to experience
    DQ.'

    If you substitute 'God' for 'DQ' this was the exact starting point of
    Quakerism in 17th century England. And to cut a long (hi)story short: every
    Quaker I know would probably agree with Platt's statement after some
    explanation of the role of Dynamic Quality in the MoQ.

    In 1643 19 year old George Fox was shocked by the failure of alleged
    Christians to live up to their Christian standards and (as he describes in
    his 'Journal', which we might now call 'memoirs') was 'called' to leave home
    and search spiritual help. Consulting without success priests, vicars,
    dissenting
    preachers, so-called experienced people and everyone else he could find, he
    at last (in 1647) 'heard a voice' which said: "There is one, even Christ
    Jesus, that can speak to thy condition". He became an itinerant preacher
    himself. He met people and religious groups with comparable experiences and
    spoke in services of more established churches, sharing essentially this
    message of the possibility of unmediated inspiration.

    This message became a unifying force for a growing group of people.
    Consequences drawn were a refusal to take oaths, refusal to pay 'hat-honor'
    (taking your hat off for a 'superior'), refusal to pay church taxes for the
    upkeep of a 'hireling' clergy, equality of status between members of the
    movement, refusal of state authority over religious life, 'thee' and 'thou'
    language etc. etc.. In this time of civil war there was some political space
    in England for the emergence of Quakers and other dissenting groups, but
    they nevertheless faced persecution from the side of political and religious
    authorities feeling (rightly) threatened. (A lot of them emigrated to
    America, where now live larger numbers than in the whole of Europe.)

    The form Quaker 'meetings for worship' took derived mainly from the groups
    and individuals called 'Seekers', who joined Quakers in large numbers. Being
    disappointed in existing churches and human endeavours to reform them, they
    already had developed a discipline of waiting in silence, alone or together,
    for some sort of 'Holy Spirit' experience, like -according to the New
    Testament- in the early Christian church.

    The organization of this movement under persecution can be credited to
    Margaret Fell, the (younger) wife of an elderly judge (who after his death
    in 1658 married George Fox). She organized the writing of letters, keeping
    track of people 'travelling in the ministry' and supporting Quakers in
    prison. Local 'meetings for worship' organized themselves in regional
    'monthly meetings' where decisions on mutual support could be made and sent
    representatives to a London-based 'meeting for sufferings' (referring to
    inprisonments and other
    persecution).

    George Fox and his contemporary Quakers spoke traditional Christian language
    and did agree on what contemporary Christians considered essential Christian
    doctrines: the Unity of Father, Son and Holy Spirit, the Divinity and
    Humanity of Christ, the reality of Sin and then need for Salvation, the
    resurrection of Christ and his redemption of Sin, the Bible being divinely
    inspired etc.. George Fox was said to know the bible almost by heart and
    quoted it often. They refused to hold each other to the words in which they
    were expressed though. In the words of George Fox as quoted by Margaret Fell
    in her description of her convincement experience:
    'He is not a Jew that is one outward, neither is that circumcision which is
    outward, but he is a Jew that is one inward, and that is circumcision which
    is of the heart. ... The Scriptures were the prophets' words and Christ's
    and the apostles' words, and what as they spoke they enjoyed and possessed
    and had it from the Lord. Then what had any to do with the Scriptures, but
    as they came to the Spirit that gave them forth. You will say, Christ saith
    this, and the apostles say this; but what canst thou say? Art thou a child
    of Light and hast walked in the Light, and what thou speakest is it inwardly
    from God?'

    The religious practice Quakers (or 'Friends' as we call each other)
    developed was one without ordained ministers, without the 'outward' kind of
    'holy' rituals called 'sacraments' in other churches (baptism, mass,
    eucharist and so on), without 'confession of faith' as requirement for
    membership, but with a strong sense of being able to experience God directly
    and intimately and to get guidance from that experience for everything from
    everyday behaviour, via special tasks (called 'concerns') you find on your
    path, to the general direction of one's life. 'Bring the whole of your life
    under the ordering of the spirit of Christ ' as an advice from 'Quaker faith
    & practice, the book of Christian discipline of the Yearly Meeting of the
    Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Britain' still reads. The main
    collective religious practices are 'meetings for worship' (silent, usually
    sitting in a circle, in which anyone can rise to share a limited amount of
    words when feeling 'called' to do so) and monthly (regional), yearly
    (roughly national) etc. 'meetings for business' (interspersed with silence
    when necessary, guided by a sense of seeking together for 'God's will for
    the meeting', open to all members and usually attenders of the 'meetings for
    worship' in that area). They can be seen as methods to practise this
    'getting guidance'. 'Meetings for business' are also used to test individual
    guidance against collective guidance (including tradition and written
    sources of accepted wisdom) and vice versa.

    Accepted language in Quakers meetings is much more diverse now than it was
    in the 17th century. I know of no real limits. You can combine being Quaker
    with being Buddhist or Universalist (recognizing what David B. called 27 Mar
    2004 18:14:46 -0700 'the values that are common to all religions or the
    mystical core of all religions') or even agnostic as far as the existence of
    'God' is concerned. Personal experience and practical application is
    preferred over theology however. The defining characteristics of Quakers are
    more in the (extreme simplicity and practicality of worshipping and
    decision-making) methods than in any content, except for that original
    idea -worded in very diverse ways, however- of the accessibility for all of
    direct Guidance.

    Despite Platt's objections (13 Mar 2004 08:59:41 -0500) Quakerism IS based
    on 'faith', but only in 3 out of the 4 senses identified by Steve Peterson
    and Sam (21 Mar 2004 17:12:43 -0500 resp. 22 Mar 2004 07:16:59 -0000): trust
    (in Guidance), loyalty (to Quaker methods of ascertaining Guidance) and
    conviction (the decision to live by it), but not factual belief (willingness
    to believe ideas that cannot be proved).

    Despite Platt's objections Quaker morality IS based on continuing 'divine'
    revelation. It is also given an intellectual basis in lots of contemporary
    writings of Quakers, however, which have equal status as the Bible (and when
    applicability counts even more). These are loosely latched in anthologies of
    quotes and guidelines (like the above-mentioned 'Quaker Faith & Practice' of
    British Friends) that are revised roughly once in every generation.

    A life devoted to pursuing Dynamic Quality through art (Platt's religion)
    would certainly fit a modern Quaker. Quaker religious practices can add (to
    that religion) the opportunity to share with others what you find in an
    environment that is sympathetic to any 'seeker' or 'student of religion' and
    skeptical of anyone who pretends that religion (that re-connects us with our
    source, DQ/God) can be a simple practising of existing methods that
    'reliably precipitate a mystical experience'.
    Quakerism is BOTH profoundly mystical, experience-based, AND practical, bent
    on 'letting your life speak'.

    Let me know if you have any questions.

    With f&Friendly greetings,

    Wim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:42:59 BST