Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere.

From: Joe (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Sun Mar 28 2004 - 23:24:56 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "MD illusions"

    On 28 March 2004 11:22 AM Mark writes to Platt:

    Hi Mark and Platt,

    Thank you very much for your discourse. The good-will and gentleness expressed by both of you are food for all of us.

    For my experience of theinorganic order evolving, I focus on sex cells unititng. As they start to build a body it seems dthey must work with the inorganic order. The inorganic order is pliaable to the other orders.

    IMO the MOQ proposes a moral hierarchy in which the higher frows from, and therefore is sustained, by the lower. That relationship is precious. It also seems the dynamic or static of the lower level can destroy the higher,e.g., geological upheavals, plalgues, wars, and vice versa. The serpent swallowing its tail. The dynamic of any order can be latched, we can talk about it. Creation, destruction, preservation in each order make it difficult to get a mystical handle on anything specific. I guess I have to work harder.

    Mystical inorganic, mystical organic, mystical social, mystical intellectual are different. What is the mystical experience claimed in: http://www.medjugorje.org/?
    Is it even mystical?

    Joe
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
      To: moq_discuss@moq.org
      Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:03 AM
      Subject: Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere.

      I think we've about reached the end of our discussion of whether inorganic
      patterns can still respond to DQ or not. When we start talking about other
      universes, anything can be assumed. I've always presupposed that the MOQ
      was about our reality, not some reality in another cosmos where perhaps
      pigs can fly. So at this point I will bow out of our conversation with
      thanks to you for the opportunity to express my views on the subject. Let
      us hold on to our common understanding in the power of beauty to draw us
      to ever higher levels of quality. For me and I'm sure for you, it's the
      lure of the aesthetic continuum that keeps us constantly seeking greater
      understanding.

      With warm regards,
      Platt

      Hi Platt,
      As you wish.
      Your challenging arguments have made me question my fundamental view of the MoQ, and that is warmly welcomed. To challenge one's fundamental view point can be a fearful prospect? One must be prepared to face the possibility of experiencing that, 'rug pulled from underneath you' feeling? One must be honest and open to change?

      I am not sure if i am up to the task, but hope to try.
      I hope you understand that i cannot proceed now until the issue of simultaneous evolution is clarified? For upon this basis rests so much of my current thinking.

      All the best,
      Mark :-)

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 28 2004 - 23:23:53 BST