From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Fri May 07 2004 - 00:03:33 BST
I'm glad somebody butted in.
I'm baffled how religion gets more than short shrift on an MoQ discussion board.
War, politics and terrorism was bad enough, but religion too !
I'll be glad when MoQ gets back on topic.
Ian
----- Original Message -----
From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: MD Religion of the future.
Hi,
Just buttin' in.
Is there a way to approach DQ without religion? I'm enjoying this thread, and
am very familiar with ZMM and Lila, and neither of those books in any fashion
endorses anything approximating religion, as far as I can tell.
Noam Chomsky has said that he thinks it's dangerous to let one's life be
motivated by non-rational belief systems, and provides plenty of historical
evidence in support. Just wondrin' what y'all think...
Hello Mark is it?
Howdy.
Although the Metaphysics of Quality does not endorse a religion it does not abandon the central insight of religion. All the social and Intellectual patterns which have surrounded this insight appear to form the main body of what the religion is rather than the insight itself?
Understanding this is a huge step forward.
I don't have any understanding of Chomsky other than a very general outline Mark.
What do you think?
All the best,
Mark.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 00:06:03 BST