From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sat May 29 2004 - 19:29:19 BST
On 29 May 2004 at 14:07, David Morey wrote:
Not entirely fair, there is clearly the possibility
of reaching too far too soon, whereby in an attempt
to improve the intellectual level freedom we may introduce freedoms
that destroy the social levels rise above the biological.
msh says:
Sure. But this is a failure of static value patterns, attempting to
bite off more than they're ready to chew, so to speak, that SQ failed
to "latch" onto DQ, for now. This doesn't mean that DQ gives way to
SQ, does it? If so, the MOQ, as I understand it, collapses.
Thanks,
msh
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 29 2004 - 20:09:24 BST