From: David Morey (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sun May 30 2004 - 12:15:07 BST
Hi Mark
Hard to draw a line here between DQ/SQ
as DQ leaves SQ in its wake. There is perhaps
a balance between retaining the SQ that still
has its role/use and reaching higher -which
depends on SQ as its ladder.
regards
David M
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Steven Heyman" <markheyman@infoproconsulting.com>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: MD MOQ and The Moral Evolution of Society.
> On 29 May 2004 at 14:07, David Morey wrote:
> Not entirely fair, there is clearly the possibility
> of reaching too far too soon, whereby in an attempt
> to improve the intellectual level freedom we may introduce freedoms
> that destroy the social levels rise above the biological.
>
> msh says:
> Sure. But this is a failure of static value patterns, attempting to
> bite off more than they're ready to chew, so to speak, that SQ failed
> to "latch" onto DQ, for now. This doesn't mean that DQ gives way to
> SQ, does it? If so, the MOQ, as I understand it, collapses.
>
> Thanks,
> msh
>
>
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 30 2004 - 13:42:09 BST